Where's the Party?
- 1 April 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in British Journal of Political Science
- Vol. 23 (2) , 235-266
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400009741
Abstract
Political parties are prominent in legislative politics and legislative research. Using data from the 99th Congress, this article assesses the degree to which significant party behaviour – defined and operationalized as behaviour that is independent of preferences – occurs in two key stages of legislative organization: the formation of standing committees and the appointment of conferees. Four hypotheses are developed and tested. When controlling for preferences and other hypothesized effects, positive and significant party effects are rare. A discussion addresses some criticisms of this unorthodox approach and attempts to reconcile some differences between these and previous findings.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Party, Political Liberalism, and RedistributionAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1990
- The Institutional Foundations of Committee PowerAmerican Political Science Review, 1987
- Majority Party Leadership Strategies for Coping with the New U. S. HouseLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1981
- What Happened to the British Party Model?American Political Science Review, 1980
- Exploring a New Role in Policy Making: The British House of Commons in the 1970sAmerican Political Science Review, 1980
- From Party Voting To Regional FragmentationAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1978
- Political Parties and the Porkbarrel: Party Conflict and Cooperation in House Public Works Committee Decision MakingAmerican Political Science Review, 1974
- Joseph G. Cannon and Howard W. Smith: An Essay on the Limits of Leadership in the House of RepresentativesThe Journal of Politics, 1968
- Party Leadership Change in the United States House of RepresentativesAmerican Political Science Review, 1967
- The Party Whip Organizations in the United States House of RepresentativesAmerican Political Science Review, 1964