The nationalisation of electoral politics: A conceptual reconstruction and review of the literature
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in West European Politics
- Vol. 19 (2) , 205-224
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389608425131
Abstract
This article revisits the theory of the nationalisation of electoral politics from both a conceptual and a methodological perspective. Presenting and evaluating this theory through a critical analysis of the major works, the article focuses on the analytical utility and the theoretical interest of such a re‐examination, and provides a new conceptual and operational definition of this political phenomenon. The concept of nationalisation is discussed in regard to three electoral dimensions: homogeneity of support; uniform swing; and responses to national factors. Combining these three dimensions, the article provides a typology of the different forms of nationalisation, explores the possibilities of its analytical application, and tries to establish the extent to which the operational definition of nationalisation corresponds to the conceptual and theoretical definition.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- LA NAZIONALIZZAZIONE DEL VOTOItalian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 1994
- Ecology of Party Strength in Western EuropeComparative Political Studies, 1985
- ESISTE UNA TENDENZA ALL'OMOGENEIZZAZIONE TERRITORIALE NEI PARTITI ITALIANI?Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 1985
- Nationalization of the American ElectorateAmerican Political Science Review, 1984
- On relative dispersion: A new solution for some old problemsQuality & Quantity, 1982
- The Attribution of Variance in Electoral Returns: An Alternative Measurement TechniqueAmerican Political Science Review, 1973
- Rejoinder to “Comment” by Donald E. StokesAmerican Political Science Review, 1973
- Comment: On the Measurement of Electoral DynamicsAmerican Political Science Review, 1973
- Measurement of Relative Variation: Sociological ExamplesAmerican Sociological Review, 1971