Training Primary Care Physicians for the 21st Century
- 16 May 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 255 (19) , 2631-2635
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1986.03370190115035
Abstract
THE TITLE of this article could well be "The Primary Care Problem Revisited." We are still struggling with the predictable sequelae of an oversupply of specialists and a shortage of primary care physicians despite serious attempts to address the problem. It is now 20 years since the publication of three major national reports that together served as the impetus for the development of family practice: the Millis, Willard, and Folsom reports.1-3 Each chronicled the increasing deficit of generalist physicians trained and committed to the practice of continuing, comprehensive, and personal health care. They called for redirection of the nation's medical education system to train larger numbers of generalist physicians. It is 16 years since the formation of the American Board of Family Practice in 1969 and more than ten years since the initiation of federal grants to encourage the training of increased numbers of family physicians, general internists, andKeywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Proposal for Financing Graduate Medical EducationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- The characteristics of training in ambulatory medicine in U.S. residenciesAcademic Medicine, 1985
- Consequences of an oversupply of specialists. The case of neurologyJAMA, 1985
- The Relative Complexity of Primary Care Provided by Medical SpecialistsMedical Care, 1984