Effects of Neuraxial Blockade May Be Difficult To Study Using Large Randomized Controlled Trials: The PeriOperative Epidural Trial (POET) Pilot Study
Open Access
- 27 February 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 4 (2) , e4644
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004644
Abstract
Early randomized controlled trials have suggested that neuraxial blockade may reduce cardiorespiratory complications after non-cardiothoracic surgery, but recent larger trials have been inconclusive. We conducted a pilot study to assess the feasibility of conducting a large multicentre randomized controlled trial in Canada. After Research Ethics Board approvals from the participating institutions, subjects were recruited if they were ≥45 years old, had an expected hospital stay ≥48 hours, were undergoing a noncardiothoracic procedure amenable to epidural analgesia, met one of six risk criteria, and did not have contraindications to neuraxial blockade. After informed consent, subjects were randomly allocated to combined epidural analgesia (epidural group) and neuraxial anesthesia, with or without general anesthesia, or intravenous opioid analgesia (IV group) and general anesthesia. The primary outcomes were the rate of recruitment and the percents of eligible patients recruited, crossed over, and followed completely. Feasibility targets were defined a priori. A blinded, independent committee adjudicated the secondary clinical outcomes. Subjects were followed daily while in hospital and then at 30 days after surgery. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Over a 15-month period, the recruitment rate was 0.5±0.3 (mean±SEM) subjects per week per centre; 112/494 (22.7%) eligible subjects were recruited at four tertiary-care teaching hospitals in Canada. Thirteen (26.5%) of 49 subjects in the epidural group crossed over to the IV group; seven (14.3%) were due to failed or inadequate analgesia or complications from epidural analgesia. Five (9.8%) of 51 subjects in the IV group crossed over to the epidural group but none were due to inadequate analgesia or complications. Ninety-eight (97.0%) of 101 subjects were successfully followed up until 30 days after their surgery. Of the criteria we defined for the feasibility of a full-scale trial, only the follow-up target was met. The other feasibility outcomes did not meet our preset criteria for success. The results suggest that a large multicentre trial may not be a feasible design to study the perioperative effects of neuraxial blockade. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 0221260 Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN 35629817Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality, not just quantity: the role of qualitative methods in anesthesia researchCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2008
- Effect of Postoperative Analgesia on Major Postoperative Complications: A Systematic Update of the EvidenceAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2007
- Rationale, design, and organization of the PeriOperative ISchemic Evaluation (POISE) Trial: A randomized controlled trial of metoprolol versus placebo in patients undergoing noncardiac surgeryAmerican Heart Journal, 2006
- Reduction in cardiovascular events after vascular surgery with atorvastatin: a randomized trialPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Postoperative Morphine Use and Hyperalgesia Are Reduced by Preoperative but Not Intraoperative Epidural AnalgesiaAnesthesiology, 2003
- Epidural Analgesia Enhances Functional Exercise Capacity and Health-related Quality of Life after Colonic SurgeryAnesthesiology, 2002
- The Comparative Effects of Postoperative Analgesic Therapies on Pulmonary OutcomeAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1998
- The Comparative Effects of Postoperative Analgesic Therapies on Pulmonary OutcomeAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1998
- Patients' refusal to participate in clinical researchPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1997
- Patients' refusal to participate in clinical researchEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology, 1997