Systematic review of prognostic models in traumatic brain injury
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 14 November 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Vol. 6 (1) , 38
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-6-38
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability world-wide. The ability to accurately predict patient outcome after TBI has an important role in clinical practice and research. Prognostic models are statistical models that combine two or more items of patient data to predict clinical outcome. They may improve predictions in TBI patients. Multiple prognostic models for TBI have accumulated for decades but none of them is widely used in clinical practice. The objective of this systematic review is to critically assess existing prognostic models for TBI METHODS: Studies that combine at least two variables to predict any outcome in patients with TBI were searched in PUBMED and EMBASE. Two reviewers independently examined titles, abstracts and assessed whether each met the pre-defined inclusion criteria. A total of 53 reports including 102 models were identified. Almost half (47%) were derived from adult patients. Three quarters of the models included less than 500 patients. Most of the models (93%) were from high income countries populations. Logistic regression was the most common analytical strategy to derived models (47%). In relation to the quality of the derivation models (n:66), only 15% reported less than 10% pf loss to follow-up, 68% did not justify the rationale to include the predictors, 11% conducted an external validation and only 19% of the logistic models presented the results in a clinically user-friendly way Prognostic models are frequently published but they are developed from small samples of patients, their methodological quality is poor and they are rarely validated on external populations. Furthermore, they are not clinically practical as they are not presented to physicians in a user-friendly way. Finally because only a few are developed using populations from low and middle income countries, where most of trauma occurs, the generalizability to these setting is limited.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognosis following head injury: a survey of doctors from developing and developed countriesJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2007
- Long term outcome after traumatic brain injuryBMJ, 2005
- Trauma care research and the war on uncertaintyBMJ, 2005
- Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and Validation of a Prognostic Score Based on Admission CharacteristicsJournal of Neurotrauma, 2005
- Systematic review and validation of prognostic models in liver transplantationLiver Transplantation, 2005
- Design and Analysis of Phase III Trials with Ordered Outcome Scales: The Concept of the Sliding DichotomyJournal of Neurotrauma, 2005
- Improving Trial Power Through Use of Prognosis-Adjusted End PointsStroke, 2005
- Predicting survival using simple clinical variables: a case study in traumatic brain injuryJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1999
- Prediction of non-survival after trauma: Innsbruck Coma ScaleThe Lancet, 1991
- Clinical Prediction RulesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985