Evaluation of Animal Carcinogenicity Studies: Cochran-Armitage Trend Test vs. Multiple Contrast Tests
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Biometrical Journal
- Vol. 42 (5) , 553-567
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4036(200009)42:5<553::aid-bimj553>3.0.co;2-r
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Permutational distribution of the log-rank statistic under random censorship with applications to carcinogenicity assays.Published by JSTOR ,1998
- Significance Levels of Randomization Trend Tests in the Event of Rare OccurrencesBiometrical Journal, 1997
- GLOBAL TESTS FOR ANALYSIS OF MULTIPLE TUMOUR DATA FROM ANIMAL CARCINOGENICITY EXPERIMENTSStatistics in Medicine, 1996
- A comparison of test procedures for multidose animal carcinogenicity assays under competing risksJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 1994
- Relationship between the shape of dose-response curves and background tumor ratesRegulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 1992
- Exact statistical tests for any carcinogenic effect in animal bioassays II. Age-adjusted testsFundamental and Applied Toxicology, 1990
- Use of dual control groups to estimate false positive rates in laboratory animal carcinogenicity studiesFundamental and Applied Toxicology, 1986
- A reexamination of false-positive rates for carcinogenesis studiesFundamental and Applied Toxicology, 1983
- Tests for Linear Trends in Proportions and FrequenciesPublished by JSTOR ,1955
- Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 TestsPublished by JSTOR ,1954