Comparison of three different automatic defibrillator implantation approaches: pectoral implantation using conscious sedation reduces procedure times and cost.
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
- Vol. 1 (3) , 221-225
- https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009768806894
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost savings with nonthoracotomy implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Comparison of Three Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation Techniques: Initial Results with Transvenous Pectoral ImplantationPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1996
- Mechanical complications after implantation of multiple-lead nonthoracotomy defibrillator systems: Implications for management and future system designAmerican Heart Journal, 1995
- Safety of implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator without general anesthesia in an electrophysiology laboratoryThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- Transvenous Cardioverter Defibrillators: Cost Implications of a Less Invasive ApproachPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1995
- Italian Multicenter Clinical Experience with Endocardial Defibrillation: Acute and Long‐Term Results in 307 PatientsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1995
- A new transvenous internal cardioverter-defibrillator: Implantation technique, complications, and short-term follow-upAmerican Heart Journal, 1995
- Cost and Length of Hospital Stay: Comparisons Between Nonthoracotomy and Epicardial Techniques in Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1995
- Implantation by electrophysiologists of 100 consecutive cardioverter defibrillators with nonthoracotomy lead systems.Circulation, 1994
- Electrophysiological laboratory, electrophysiologist-implanted, nonthoracotomy-implantable cardioverter/defibrillators.Circulation, 1994