Five-Year Outcomes After Coronary Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Multivessel Disease
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 22 July 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 46 (4) , 575-581
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.082
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Polymer-Based, Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Standard Stents in Patients with Stenosis in a Native Coronary ArteryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year outcomesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2003
- A decade of change—risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990–1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research InstituteThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2002
- Comparison of Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery and Stenting for the Treatment of Multivessel DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Argentine randomized study: coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple-vessel disease (ERACI II): 30-day and one-year follow-up resultsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
- The ARTS (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study): Background, goals and methodsInternational Journal of Cardiovascular Interventions, 1999
- Estimation of a Common Effect Parameter from Sparse Follow-Up DataPublished by JSTOR ,1985