What Preclinical Data Are Needed to Justify Once‐Daily Therapy?
- 1 August 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 32 (8) , 698-705
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1992.tb03872.x
Abstract
Before applying in clinical practice once‐daily dosing of antimicrobials, one must take into consideration several factors that may influence the pharmacodynamic interaction between antimicrobials and microbes at the site of infection. The ideal agent should demonstrate rapid concentration‐dependent killing activity and a postantibiotic effect that could allow for a clinically significant delay with levels below the minimal inhibitory concentration before regrowth of the microorganism. The pharmacokinetic properties of the antibiotic should allow for a good therapeutic ratio (concentration/MIC) at the site of infection. To evaluate the importance of dosage schedule on outcome, investigators have to use animal models where peak levels, half‐life, area under the curve, time above MIC in interstitial fluid or infected tissues, and other pharmacodynamic properties can be evaluated simultaneously. The pharmacodynamics of several antibiotics administered at different dosing interval is compared using an animal model of infected fibrin clots. In this model, once‐daily therapy resulted in better killing than other modes of administration. Aminoglycosides and quinolones may be better suited for once‐daily therapy than β‐lactams unless these latter agents have a long half‐life.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Kinetics of antimicrobial activityThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1986
- Influence of four modes of administration on penetration of aztreonam, cefuroxime, and ampicillin into interstitial fluid and fibrin clots and on in vivo efficacy against Haemophilus influenzaeAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1985
- Comparison of the Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Systemic Administration on the Penetration of Gentamicin into Infected Rabbit EyesThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1983
- Continuous vs. Intermittent Administration of Antimicrobial Agents: Tissue Penetration and Efficacy in VivoClinical Infectious Diseases, 1981
- Interstitial diffusion and accumulation of cephalothin according to various modes of intermittent administration to rabbitsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1978
- A comparative trial of sisomicin therapy by intermittent versus continuous infusionThe Lancet Healthy Longevity, 1977
- Factors influencing the distribution of antibacterial agents in interstitial tissue fluid: Molecular size and protein bindingInfection, 1976
- Penetration of Antibiotics into Fibrin Loci in Vivo. III. Intermittent vs. Continuous Infusion and the Effect of ProbenecidThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1974
- TREATMENT OF STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS WITH PENICILLIN BY INTERMITTENT STERILISATIONThe Lancet, 1944