Getting research findings into practice: When to act on the evidence
- 11 July 1998
- Vol. 317 (7151) , 139-142
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7151.139
Abstract
This is the second in a series of eight articles analysing the gap between research and practice Series editors: Andrew Haines and Anna Donald There is increasing interest in providing evidence based health care—that is, care in which healthcare professionals, provider managers, those who commission health care, the public, and policymakers consistently consider research evidence when making decisions. 1 2 Purchasers, for example, should be able to influence the organisation and delivery of care (such as for cancer3 and stroke services4) and the type and content of services (such as using chiropractic for back pain or dilatation and curettage and drug treatment for menorrhagia5). Policymakers should ensure that policies on treatment reflect and are consistent with research evidence, and that the incentive structure within the health system promotes cost effective practice. They must also ensure that there is an adequate infrastructure for monitoring changes in practice and for producing, gathering, summarising, and disseminating evidence. Clinicians determine the day to day care patients receive in healthcare systems, and user groups (for example, patients, their families, and their representatives) are also beginning to play an important role in influencing healthcare decisions.6 The factors described below should be considered when deciding whether to act on or promote the implementation of research findings. #### Summary pointsKeywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative dataBMJ, 2000
- Beware of Surrogate Outcome MeasuresInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1996
- Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1995
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Users' guides to the medical literature. IV. How to use an article about harm. Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1994
- Intercept studies, clinical trials, and cluster experiments: To whom can we extrapolate?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1994
- Generalizing from clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1994
- Knowing and Acting in Medical Practice: The Epistemological Politics of Outcomes ResearchJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1994
- Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1993
- Cholesterol lowering and mortality: the importance of considering initial level of risk.BMJ, 1993