The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- 1 June 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 50 (6) , 683-691
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00049-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risks and benefits of aerosolized pentamidine and cotrimoxazole in primary prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in HIV-1-infected patients: a two-year Italian multicentric randomized controlled trialJournal of Infection, 1996
- A Randomized Trial of Three Antipneumocystis Agents in Patients with Advanced Human Immunodeficiency Virus InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Four different regimens for prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and toxoplasma encephalitis in HIV-infected patientsAIDS, 1994
- Primary prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumoniaAIDS, 1993
- A Controlled Trial of Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole or Aerosolized Pentamidine for Secondary Prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia in Patients with the Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- A Controlled Trial of Aerosolized Pentamidine or Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole as Primary Prophylaxis againstPneumocystis cariniiPneumonia in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Patient tolerance of nebulized pentamidine or cotrimoxazole as secondary prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumoniaAIDS, 1992
- LettersArthritis & Rheumatism, 1991
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981