MDCT Determination of Volume and Function of the Left Ventricle: Are Short-Axis Image Reformations Necessary?
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 186 (6_suppleme) , S371-S378
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.04.1764
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Determination of left ventricular (LV) volumes and global function parameters from MDCT data sets is usually based on short-axis reformations from primarily reconstructed axial images, which prolong postprocessing time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of LV volumetry and global LV function assessment from axial images in comparison with short-axis image reformations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This study consisted of 20 patients with either coronary artery disease or dilated cardiomyopathy. We evaluated MDCT results using cine MRI as the reference technique. RESULTS. LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and end-systolic volume (LVESV) were significantly overestimated by the axial MDCT approach in comparison with volume measurements from short-axis CT image reformations. The mean LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was not significantly different (41.2% vs 42.7%). Short-axis and axial MDCT determination of LVEF revealed a systematic underestimation by a mean ± SD of -2.1% ± 3.6% versus -3.6% ± 8.2%, respectively, when compared with LVEF values based on cine MRI. The interobserver variability for volume and function measurements from axial images (LVEDV = 8.5%, LVESV = 10.8%, LVEF = 9.6%) was slightly higher than those measurements from short-axis reformations (LVEDV = 7.2%, LVESV = 9.5%, LVEF = 8.7%). The mean total evaluation time was significantly shorter using axial images (14.1 ± 3.9 min) compared with short-axis reformations (16.9 ± 5.2 min) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION. Determination of LV volumes and assessment of global LV function from axial MDCT image reformations is feasible and time efficient. This approach might be a clinically useful alternative to established short-axis-based measurements in patients with normal or near-normal LV function. A progressive underestimation of LVEF with increasing LV volumes may limit the clinical applicability of the axial approach in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multi–Detector Row CT of Left Ventricular Function with Dedicated Analysis Software versus MR Imaging: Initial ExperienceRadiology, 2004
- Evaluation of Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: CT Angiographic Assessment of Grafts and Coronary ArteriesRadiology, 2003
- Evaluation of Global Left Ventricular Myocardial Function with Electrocardiogram-Gated Multidetector Computed TomographyInvestigative Radiology, 2003
- Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses With Thin-Slice Multi-Detector Row Spiral Computed Tomography and Multiplanar ReconstructionCirculation, 2003
- Quantifizierung der Herzfunktion in der Mehrschicht Spiral CT mit retrospektivem EKG-Gating: Vergleich zur KernspintomographieRöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 2003
- Using ECG-Gated Multidetector CT to Evaluate Global Left Ventricular Myocardial Function in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2002
- Usefulness of dynamic multislice computed tomography of left ventricular function in unstable angina pectoris and comparison with echocardiographyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2002
- Reliable Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Fast Submillimeter Multislice Spiral Computed TomographyCirculation, 2002
- Coronary artery aneurysm and type-A aortic dissection demonstrated by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CTEuropean Radiology, 2001
- Comparison Between Manual and Semiautomated Analysis of Left Ventricular Volume Parameters from Short-Axis MR ImagesJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1997