Perceptions of equipoise are crucial to trial participation: a qualitative study of men in the ProtecT study
- 13 May 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Controlled Clinical Trials
- Vol. 24 (3) , 272-282
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00020-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Why don’t they just tell me straight, why allocate it?” The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trialSocial Science & Medicine, 2002
- Barriers to Participation in Randomised Controlled Trials: A Systematic ReviewPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trialBMJ, 1998
- Attitudes of patients to randomised clinical trials of cancer therapyEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1998
- Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trialSocial Science & Medicine, 1997
- Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: Literature summary and annotated bibliographyControlled Clinical Trials, 1997
- Randomised controlled trials in general practiceBMJ, 1995
- Randomised clinical trials in general practice: lessons from a failure.BMJ, 1991
- Patients' willingness to enter clinical trials: Measuring the association with perceived benefit and preference for decision participationSocial Science & Medicine, 1991
- Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987