Racial Disparity in the Relationship Between Hospital Volume and Mortality Among Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
- 1 November 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 248 (5) , 886-892
- https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e318189b1bc
Abstract
To examine whether the volume-mortality relationship in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) differs by race and operative risk. In-hospital mortality after CABG is inversely associated with hospital volume. Racial disparities exist in the outcomes of CABG, possibly due to blacks' high operative risk. We analyzed 71,949 CABG procedures performed between 2002 and 2005 at 93 academic medical centers participating in the University HealthSystem Consortium. In-hospital mortality was examined across hospital volume categories (very low, or =500/yr) via logistic regression. In-hospital mortality was 2.0% in whites and 2.8% in blacks. Controlling for patient risk, geographic region, and proportion of African American patients treated at the hospital, the benefit of higher volume was substantial for blacks but only modest for whites (race-by-volume interaction; P = 0.033). Odds ratios of mortality for increasing volume categories (compared with very low volume) were 0.46, 0.37, and 0.47 among blacks but only 0.85, 0.77, and 0.75 among whites. Racial disparities in mortality existed mostly in very low-volume hospitals. The differential volume effect across the 2 racial groups seemed to be primarily driven by regional patterns, as the volume effect was much more pronounced in the South and the Midwest (region by volume interaction; P = 0.033). Blacks have greater reduction in mortality than whites by undergoing CABG at higher-volume hospitals, regardless of operative risk. Because of limited generalizability, these findings should be confirmed using more representative database.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trends in Hospital and Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality for Cancer SurgeryAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2006
- Operative Mortality and Procedure Volume as Predictors of Subsequent Hospital PerformanceAnnals of Surgery, 2006
- Procedural Volume as a Marker of Quality for CABG SurgeryJAMA, 2004
- Hospital Volume and Operative Mortality in Cancer SurgeryArchives of Surgery, 2003
- Should Volume Standards for Cardiovascular Surgery Focus Only on High-Risk Patients?Circulation, 2003
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The role of hospital volume in coronary artery bypass grafting: is more always better?11>Presented, in part, at the Annual Meeting of the American Heart Association in New Orleans, Louisiana, on November 13, 2000.Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
- Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume and Outcomes of Total Hip Replacement in the United States Medicare Population*Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2001
- Impact of Hospital Volume on Operative Mortality for Major Cancer SurgeryJAMA, 1998
- Hospital vascular surgery volume and procedure mortality rates in California, 1982-1994Journal of Vascular Surgery, 1998