Lower extremity venography with iohexol: results and complications.
- 1 November 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 177 (2) , 503-505
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.177.2.2217792
Abstract
The frequency of side effects of a nonionic contrast agent (iohexol) was studied in 463 consecutive patients who underwent venography for clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and compared with the frequency of adverse reactions of another series in which patients received either the same contrast material or a high-osmolar ionic compound. Minor side effects, including local pain and discomfort, nausea and vomiting, dizziness, skin reactions, superficial phlebitis, and edema, occurred in 83 patients (17.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 15%-22%). The only serious adverse reaction (bronchospasm) was seen in two patients (0.4%; 95% CI, 0.1%-1.4%). Postvenographic thrombosis confirmed by means of repeat venography occurred in one of 41 consecutive patients with a previous normal venogram (incidence, 2%; 95% CI, 0%-13%). The frequency of side effects appears to be significantly less than when conventional high-osmolar contrast agents are used. Use of iohexol for venography is associated with minor side effects in approximately one-fifth of patients, and serious adverse reactions necessitating therapy are rare.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Detection of Deep-Vein Thrombosis by Real-Time B-Mode UltrasonographyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Contrast venography of the leg: diagnostic efficacy, tolerance, and complication rates with ionic and nonionic contrast media.Radiology, 1987
- 125I-fibrinogen uptake following phlebography of the leg. Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media.Radiology, 1980
- Reduction of venous thrombosis complicating phlebographyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1980
- DIAGNOSIS OF DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS IN THE OUTPATIENT BY VENOGRAPHY1980