Androgyny, Sex-Role Orientation, and Homosexism
- 1 September 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 112 (1) , 39-45
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1982.9923532
Abstract
In a study of the relationship between homosexism and both psychological androgyny and normative sex-role orientation, questionnaires were administered to 87 male and 119 female college students. Results indicate that males were less androgynous, more traditional in sex-role orientation, and more homosexist than females. Homosexism was significantly related to sex-role orientation among males and to both androgyny and sex-role orientation among females. Homosexism appeared to contribute to maintaining traditional sexual differentiation among both males and females. This occurred more on the normative than on the psychological level.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring Prejudice against Homosexuality (Homosexism) among College Students: A New ScaleThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1982
- Attitudes toward homosexuality: Feminist attitudes and sexual conservatismSex Roles, 1976
- Measuring Sex-Role Orientation: A Normative ApproachJournal of Marriage and Family, 1976
- Some Characteristics of Those Who Hold Positive and Negative Attitudes Toward HomosexualsJournal of Homosexuality, 1976
- Attitudes toward Homosexuality Among West Indian Male and Female College StudentsThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1975
- An Investigation of Sex-Related Slang Vocabulary and Sex-Role Orientation among Male and Female University StudentsJournal of Marriage and Family, 1974
- Attitudes Toward Homosexuality Among Brazilian and Canadian College StudentsThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1973
- Some Correlates of Attitudes toward HomosexualityThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1973
- Attitudes toward homosexuality: Preservation of sex morality or the double standard?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973
- Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968