The social dimensions of correctional officer stress
- 1 December 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Justice Quarterly
- Vol. 2 (4) , 505-533
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07418828500088711
Abstract
Based on a survey of line staff in a southern correctional system, we analyzed how various stressors, coping factors, and status characteristics influenced three types of stress: work stress, job dissatisfaction, and life stress. The stressors of role problems and perceived dangerousness were positively related to multiple forms of stress. While supervisory support mitigated both work stress and job dissatisfaction, the effects of other coping factors were variable. Black and educated officers had higher levels of dissatisfaction, while female officers experienced more stress on the job. Taken together, the independent variables in our framework accounted for a large amount of the variance of work stress, a moderate amount of job dissatisfaction, and a relatively low amount of life stress. Apart from the specific findings, the data suggest that theoretical models of officer stress must incorporate coping factors and specify how the dimensions of an officer's occupational role and personality differentially impact on distinct types of stress.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- COLLECTIVE SECURITY AND FATAL FIREARM ACCIDENTS*Criminology, 1985
- Mental Health Work in Prisons and JailsCriminal Justice and Behavior, 1985
- Implementing Determinate Sentencing in Illinois: Conscience and ConvenienceCriminal Justice Review, 1983
- The Guard Subculture MythJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1982
- Some Correlates of Prison Guards' BeliefsCriminal Justice and Behavior, 1981
- ROLE STRESS, CUSTODY ORIENTATION, AND DISCIPLINARY ACTIONSCriminology, 1980
- What Prison Guards Think: A Profile of the Illinois ForceCrime & Delinquency, 1978
- The CES-D ScaleApplied Psychological Measurement, 1977
- Prison GuardUrban Life, 1975
- Illegitimate Means, Anomie, and Deviant BehaviorAmerican Sociological Review, 1959