Observations on the function of the female urethra: III: An overview with special reference to the relation between urethral hypermobility and urethral incompetence

Abstract
Aims To analyze the relation between urethral hypermobility and urethral incompetence, and to summarize the interdependence between maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP), urethral hypermobility, and urethral incompetence. Patients and Methods A group of 255 patients was selected from a large bank of cases. Inclusion criteria were age 20 years or above, no neurological disease, stable bladder, and no previous incontinence surgery or hysterectomy. The degree of hypermobility (cysto‐urethrocele) and the degree of urethral incompetence (abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP)) were determined. Statistical analyses between urethral hypermobility and incompetence were performed with Spearman's correlation and the Jonckherre‐Terpstra test. Results The Spearman's rank correlation test showed a statistically significant relation between urethral hypermobility and the degree of urethral incompetence (P = 0.0049). Conclusions The statistically significant relation between urethral incompetence and hypermobility suggests that urethral incompetence will increase as the degree of urethral hypermobility does. Optimal conditions for urinary continence include a high maximum urethral closure pressure, absence of hypermobility, and a low degree of urethral incompetence. This last factor is assured by a strong support underneath the urethra permitting compression of the latter during straining. Failure of the urethral closure mechanism is highly probable with a diminished maximum closure pressure accompanied by urethral hypermobility often associated with a high degree of urethral incompetence. Clinically significant urinary incontinence may appear in many intermediate circumstances between these two extreme states, but stress urinary incontinence is essentially an activity‐related phenomenon. Neurourol. Urodynam. 23:22–26, 2004.