Leading Indicators of Banking Crises: Was Asia Different?
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- Published by International Monetary Fund (IMF) in IMF Working Papers
- Vol. 98 (91)
- https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451951745.001
Abstract
This paper examines episodes of the banking system distress and crisis in a large sample of countries. The empirical results identify several macroeconomic and financial variables as useful leading indicators. The main macroeconomic indicators were of limited value in predicting the Asian crises; the best warning signs were proxies for the vulnerability of the banking and corporate sector. Full-blown banking crises are shown to be more associated with external developments, and domestic variables are the main leading indicators of severe but contained banking distress.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Determinants of Banking Crises in Developing and Developed CountriesStaff Papers, 1998
- Determinants of Banking System Fragility: A Case Study of MexicoStaff Papers, 1997
- The Twin Crises: The Causes of Banking and Balance-of-Payments ProblemsInternational Finance Discussion Papers, 1996
- Banking Sector Fragility and Systemic Sources of FragilityIMF Working Papers, 1996
- Costly liquidation, interbank trade, bank runs and panicsJournal of Financial Intermediation, 1992
- Bank failure contagion in historical perspectiveJournal of Monetary Economics, 1991
- BANKING PANICS AND BUSINESS CYCLES *Oxford Economic Papers, 1988
- Distinguishing Panics and Information-based Bank Runs: Welfare and Policy ImplicationsJournal of Political Economy, 1988
- Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and LiquidityJournal of Political Economy, 1983
- Manias, Panics and CrashesPublished by Springer Nature ,1978