Visitors to national parks: A test of the elitism argument
- 1 January 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Leisure Sciences
- Vol. 1 (4) , 395-409
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01490407809512897
Abstract
It frequently has been assumed that the poor and some minority groups largely lack the financial wherewithal to travel to America's national parks. Data showing an underrepresentation of the poor among visitors at some parks has spurred charges of “elitism” in national park use, and has been an often‐used argument to justify more development (especially the provision of low‐cost facilities) in the national parks. This study tested for relationships between several status characteristics and the national park visitation of residents of the Pacific Coastal Region. As hypothesized, income, education, occupation and a cumulative status measure were all positively related to the frequency of national park going. But the low magnitude of the relationships suggests that the charges of “elitism” in national park going are overdrawn, and that perhaps there has been a substantial democratization of social‐class access to a “national park experience” during this century.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Status Group Dynamics Approach to Predicting Participation Rates in Regional Recreation Demand StudiesLand Economics, 1977
- Neighborhood ParksEvaluation Quarterly, 1977
- The Relative Importance of Education and Income as Predictors in Outdoor Recreation ParticipationJournal of Leisure Research, 1975
- The Distribution of Income Among Wilderness UsersJournal of Leisure Research, 1975
- Social and Attitudinal Variants In High and Low Use of Outdoor Recreational FacilitiesJournal of Leisure Research, 1973
- Social Groups as a Basis for Assessing Participation in Selected Water ActivitiesJournal of Leisure Research, 1973
- The Telephone Interview in Leisure ResearchJournal of Leisure Research, 1973
- A Review of the Empirical Analyses that have been Based upon the National Recreation SurveysJournal of Leisure Research, 1972