Clinical evaluation of a new polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens
- 1 October 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 31 (10) , 2648-2653
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.31.10.2648-2653.1993
Abstract
A clinical evaluation of the Amplicor polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical swabs (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, N.J.) is described. This new clinical system used one-step sample preparation, amplification with biotinylated cryptic plasmid primer pairs (CP24-CP27), uracil-N-glycosylase (AmpErase), and a microtiter format for amplicon capture and detection. Culture with McCoy cells in duplicate 1-dram (3.697-ml) vials with fluorescent immunostaining was the reference system. Endocervical swab samples from 945 women provided 74 culture-positive specimens, of which PCR detected 71. The initial PCR result was positive for 12 additional specimens. Arbitration of the PCR-positive, culture-negative samples by PCR with major outer membrane protein primers, duplicate culture, elementary body direct fluorescent-antibody staining, and DNA extraction PCR showed that all 12 samples were positive for chlamydia, raising the number of truly positive samples from 74 to 86. After arbitration the true sensitivities of PCR and culture were 96.5 and 86%, respectively (P = 0.02). Specificities for both were 100%. For PCR, the positive and negative predictive values were 100 and 99.7%, respectively. Total test efficiency was 99.7%. A high-test-volume (121 samples) timing study with all items included in the College of American Pathologists work load method indicated that this PCR format took approximately 3 min per sample. Because of the high sensitivity, specificity, and improved ease of handling, we found PCR to be a good alternative to culture for detection of C. trachomatis.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assayJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1993
- Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens by polymerase chain reactionJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1992
- Comparison of three nonradioisotopic polymerase chain reaction-based methods for detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 1992
- Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and Chlamydiazyme for the detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimensEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1992
- Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis eye infection in Tanzania by polymerase chain reaction/enzyme immunoassayThe Lancet, 1991
- Detection of C trachomatis in urogenital specimens by polymerase chain reaction.Sexually Transmitted Infections, 1991
- Current problems in microbiology: 1. Chlamydial infections: which laboratory test?Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1991
- Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens by the polymerase chain reactionEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1990
- Chlamydia trachomatis among sexually active teenage girls. Lack of correlation between chlamydial infection, history of the patient and clinical signs of infectionBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1988
- Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Genitourinary InfectionsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1988