Bootstrap tests of significance and the case for humanlike skeletal-size dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis
- 1 October 2006
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Human Evolution
- Vol. 51 (4) , 422-428
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.06.001
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are the differences between Stw 431 (Australopithecus africanus) and A.L. 288-1 (A. afarensis) significant?Journal of Human Evolution, 2005
- Neanderthal taxonomy reconsidered: Implications of 3D primate models of intra- and interspecific differencesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004
- A simulation test of hominoid species number at Lufeng, China: implications for the use of the coefficient of variation in paleotaxonomyJournal of Human Evolution, 1998
- Size Variation in Middle Pleistocene HumansScience, 1997
- Phenetic affinities among earlyHomocrania from East and South AfricaJournal of Human Evolution, 1996
- Comparative application of the coefficient of variation and range-based statistics for assessing the taxonomic composition of fossil samplesJournal of Human Evolution, 1995
- Taxonomic affinity of the early Homo cranium from Swartkrans, South AfricaAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1993
- Human taxonomic diversity in the pleistocene: Does Homo erectus represent multiple hominid species?American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1993
- Falsification of a single species hypothesis using the coefficient of variation: A simulation approachAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1992
- Extreme sexual dimorphism in a Miocene hominoidNature, 1991