Effect of the Number of Variables on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
- Vol. 10 (3) , 333-351
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1003_1
Abstract
There has been relatively little systematic investigation of the effect of the number of variables on measures of model fit in structural equation modeling. There is conflicting evidence as to whether measures of fit tend to improve or decline as more variables are added to the model. We consider 3 different types of specification error: minor factors, 2-factor models, and method errors. Using a formal method based on the noncentrality parameter (NCP), we find that root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) tends to improve regardless of the type of specification error and that the comparative fit index (CFI) and Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), generally, though not always, tend to worsen as the number of variables in the model increases. The formal method that we develop can be used to investigate other measures of fit and other types of misspecification.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Noncentral Chi-square Distribution in Misspecified Structural Equation Models: Finite Sample Results from a Monte Carlo SimulationMultivariate Behavioral Research, 2002
- Item Parceling Strategies in SEM: Investigating the Subtle Effects of Unmodeled Secondary ConstructsOrganizational Research Methods, 1999
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- A method for exploring the effects of attrition in randomized experiments with dichotomous outcomes.Psychological Methods, 1998
- The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis.Psychological Methods, 1996
- Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indicesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1995
- Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991
- The Effect of Sampling Error on Convergence, Improper Solutions, and Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Maximum Likelihood Confirmatory Factor AnalysisPsychometrika, 1984
- Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin, 1980