What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research
Top Cited Papers
- 22 May 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Business and Psychology
- Vol. 25 (3) , 325-334
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interactive Effects of Growth Need Strength, Work Context, and Job Complexity On Self-Reported Creative PerformanceThe Academy of Management Journal, 2009
- Method Effects of Positive Affectivity, Negative Affectivity, and Impression Management in Self-Reports of Work AttitudesHuman Performance, 2001
- The effect of item content overlap on Organizational Commitment Questionnaire–turnover cognitions relationships.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001
- The earth is round (p < .05).American Psychologist, 1994
- Additive and Multiplicative Method Effects in Applied Psychological Research: An Empirical Assessment of Three ModelsJournal of Management, 1994
- Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990
- Estimating Trait, Method, and Error Variance: Generalizing across 70 Construct Validation StudiesJournal of Marketing Research, 1987
- Editorial: Some Remarks From the Outgoing Editor.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982
- Validation of an S-O-R Model for Situation, Enduring, and Response Components of InvolvementJournal of Marketing Research, 1982
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959