Diagnostic performance of coronary magnetic resonance angiography as compared against conventional x-ray angiography
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 44 (9) , 1867-1876
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.051
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative evaluation of coronary stenosis by coronary magnetic resonance angiography.Heart and Vessels, 2000
- Klinischer Nutzen der Magnetresonanztomographie zur Darstellung von Koronarstenosen: Ein Vergleich mit der Koronarangiographie und der MyokardszintigraphieDeutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 1999
- Directed Proximal Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography Compared With Conventional Contrast Coronary AngiographyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1997
- Clinical utility of two-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in detecting coronary artery diseaseEuropean Heart Journal, 1997
- Magnetic resonance coronary angiography in heart transplant recipientsCoronary Artery Disease, 1996
- Three-dimensional respiratory-gated MR angiography of coronary arteries: comparison with conventional coronary angiography.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1996
- Assessment of coronary artery stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging.Heart, 1996
- Two-dimensional coronary MR angiography: analysis of initial clinical results.Radiology, 1994
- A Preliminary Report Comparing Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography with Conventional AngiographyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Coronary arteriography 1984–1987: A report of the registry of the society for cardiac angiography and interventions. I. Results and complicationsCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1989