Immunological and physical properties of allergen solutions
- 1 January 1991
- Vol. 46 (1) , 1-9
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.1991.tb00535.x
Abstract
Lyophilised birch pollen allergen extracts, reconstituted with different diluents (H2O, saline, Albumin diluent® (AD)) were investigated to determine whether the allergen activity and quality of the extracts deteriorated by nebulization with different nebulizers (Pari, Wright, and Samdoz). Allergen activity was measured by IgG4 RAST inhibition technique and allergen quality was analysed by crossed immunoelectrophoresis (CIE). The distribution of particle sizes of aerosols different allergen solutions was determined by a TSI Aerodynamic Particle Sizer. A significant difference (P < 0.05) in allergen activity was found between the AD and H2O diluents before and after using a Sandoz nebulizer and a Wright nebulizer equipped with a small chamber. This suggested greater allergen activity in AD‐diluted solutions, and the pattern was repeated with the other two nebulizers, but was not statistically significant. The samples diluted with saline showed no significant differences in quality after nebulization except for the impacted aerosol in which one of the precipitates was slightly diminished. In the AD‐diluted sample one of the precipitates disappeared from the impacted aerosol and from the nebulization chamber after 2 min nebulization. To CIE with rabbit anti‐human albumin in an intermediate gel. By this procedure one precipitate was transformed to a precipitate in the intermediate gel, indicating that one or more proteins in the extracts may associate with albumin. No significant difference in output was observed between the nebulizers. The particle size distribution curves for each diluent (saline, AD) were identical for the Wright nebulizer with 99% of the dry particles distributed within 0.5–2.0 μm. Although allergen solutions reconstituted with different diluents were not deteriorated in different nebulizers, it may be that the addition of human albumin to an allergen solution may induce one or more proteins in the extracts to associate with it. This could reduce allergen adsorption over periods longer than this study. The use of different diluents did not change the distribution of particle size generated by the nebulizer tested.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Immunochemical estimations of allergenic activities from outdoor aero‐allergens, collected by a high‐volume air samplerAllergy, 1989
- Bronchial allergen challenge: comparison between two different methods of provocationClinical and Experimental Allergy, 1987
- Analysis of Allergen Components in Grass Pollen Extracts using ImmunoblottingInternational Archives of Allergy and Immunology, 1986
- An investigation of possible immunologic reactions to human serum albumin used as a stabilizer in allergy extractsJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1985
- A Three‐Layer Immunoradiometric Assay for Determination of IgG Subclass Antibodies in Human Sera (“IgG Subclass RAST”)Allergy, 1984
- The effect of preservatives and dilution on the deterioration of Russian thistle (), a pollen extractJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1979
- Quantitative Immunoelectrophoretic Methods as a Tool for the Analysis and Isolation of Allergens (Part 1 of 3)Published by S. Karger AG ,1978
- The stability of short ragweed pollen extract as measured by skin test and antigen EJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1976
- Studies on the stability of diluted allergen extracts using the radioallergosorbent test (RAST)Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 1973