Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Child Abuse & Neglect
- Vol. 20 (12) , 1251-1259
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-2134(96)00121-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Investigative Utterance Types on Israeli Children's ResponsesInternational Journal of Behavioral Development, 1996
- Concerning Practices of Interviewers When Using Anatomical Dolls in Child Protective Services InvestigationsChild Maltreatment, 1996
- Anatomically detailed dolls do not facilitate preschoolers' reports of a pediatric examination involving genital touching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1995
- The investigation of child sexual abuse: An interdisciplinary consensus statementChild Abuse & Neglect, 1994
- Putting the anatomical doll controversy in perspective: An examination of the major uses and criticisms of the dolls in child sexual abuse evaluationsChild Abuse & Neglect, 1994
- Evaluating children's reports of sexual abuse: Results from a survey of professionals.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Children's Use of Anatomically Detailed Dolls to Recount an EventChild Development, 1990
- Use of anatomical dolls among professionals in sexual abuse evaluationsChild Abuse & Neglect, 1988
- An assessment of the behavior of sexually abused and nonsexually abused children with anatomically correct dollsChild Abuse & Neglect, 1987
- An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning child witnessesBritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1979