Are health professionals ready for the new philosophy of concordance in medicine taking?

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Objectives To develop and administer a practical, valid and reliable tool to measure attitudes to concordance in medicine taking, a new concept where decisions depend on an equal partnership between patient and prescriber. Method A postal questionnaire was devised comprising statements from the original concordance document, along with statements reflecting the orthodox model of medicine taking. There was a total of 22 statements. Respondents rated each statement on a four-point Likert agreement scale. The questionnaire also included three scenarios of consultations involving medicine prescribing and taking, with associated statements for rating as true or false. Setting A random sample of 207 medical, nursing and pharmacy graduates in the North of England at the time of qualification. We received 81 completed questionnaires (39 per cent) Key findings Item analysis reduced the 22-item scale to a 12-item scale with good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79) and construct validity was demonstrated through correlation with responses to the scenarios. Although the typical respondent had a positive attitude towards concordance (mean = 2.3), 25 per cent of respondents had negative attitudes. Pharmacists showed the least favourable attitudes (P<0.05) Conclusions The 12-item Leeds Attitude Towards Concordance (LATCon) scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing health care providers' attitudes to the new concept of concordance in medicine taking. Newly qualified doctors, nurses and pharmacists tended to hold favourable attitudes, although a significant minority — especially pharmacists — hold negative attitudes. These results have implications for undergraduate education and continuing professional education.