Developing a Framework for Transferring Knowledge Into Action: A Thematic Analysis of the Literature
Top Cited Papers
- 11 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
- Vol. 14 (3) , 156-164
- https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008120
Abstract
Objectives: Although there is widespread agreement about the importance of transferring knowledge into action, we still lack high quality information about what works, in which settings and with whom. While there are a large number of models and theories for knowledge transfer interventions, the majority are untested, meaning that their applicability and relevance is largely unknown. This paper describes the development of a conceptual framework of translating knowledge into action and discusses how it can be used for developing a useful model of the knowledge transfer process. Methods: A narrative review of the knowledge transfer literature identified 28 different models which explained all or part of the knowledge transfer process. The models were subjected to a thematic analysis to identify individual components and the types of processes used when transferring knowledge into action. The results were used to build a conceptual framework of the process. Results: Five common components of the knowledge transfer process were identified: problem identification and communication; knowledge/research development and selection; analysis of context; knowledge transfer activities or interventions; and knowledge/research utilization. We also identified three types of knowledge transfer processes: a linear process; a cyclical process; and a dynamic multidirectional process. From these results a conceptual framework of knowledge transfer was developed. The framework illustrates the five common components of the knowledge transfer process and shows that they are connected via a complex, multidirectional set of interactions. As such the framework allows for the individual components to occur simultaneously or in any given order and to occur more than once during the knowledge transfer process. Conclusion: Our framework provides a foundation for gathering evidence from case studies of knowledge transfer interventions. We propose that future empirical work is designed to test and refine the relevance, importance and applicability of each of the components in order to build a more useful model of knowledge transfer which can serve as a practical checklist for planning or evaluating knowledge transfer activities.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Knowledge brokering: Exploring the process of transferring knowledge into actionBMC Health Services Research, 2009
- Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challengesImplementation Science, 2008
- Knowledge Transfer and Exchange: Review and Synthesis of the LiteratureThe Milbank Quarterly, 2007
- Some Theoretical Underpinnings of Knowledge TranslationAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2007
- Illuminating the Processes of Knowledge Transfer in NursingWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 2007
- Research, public policymaking, and knowledge-translation processes: Canadian efforts to build bridgesJournal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 2006
- Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map?Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 2006
- Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and RecommendationsThe Milbank Quarterly, 2004
- The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effectBMJ, 2003
- Disseminating Innovations in Health CareJAMA, 2003