Why (Cancer) Risk Communication Can Be Hard
Open Access
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Monographs
- Vol. 1999 (25) , 7-13
- https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024213
Abstract
Effective risk communication uses audience members' time well by providing them with the information that they most need, in a form that they can easily comprehend. Accomplishing this task can be hard because of problems with both the transmitter and the receiver. The former must determine what is most worth saying. The latter must integrate that message with their often fragmentary mental models of the processes creating and controlling the risks. One strategy for improving communication is to use analytic methods for selecting the information to transmit, based on its criticality to recipients' decision making. A second strategy for improving communications is adapting the message to the cognitive processes of its recipients. Together, these strategies can reveal the limits to communication and how best to work within them.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Real World: What Good Is It?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Contrasting perceptions of the risks of using nuclear energy sources in spaceJournal of Environmental Psychology, 1993
- What does the phrase “safer sex” mean to you?ʼ Understanding among Glaswegian 18-year-olds in 1990AIDS, 1993
- Informed consent does not mean rational consentJournal of Legal Medicine, 1990
- Verbal versus numerical probabilities: Efficiency, biases, and the preference paradoxOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1990
- Knowledge MapsManagement Science, 1989
- In search of the seven dwarves: Issues of measurement and meaning in alcohol expectancy research.Psychological Bulletin, 1989
- Perception of RiskScience, 1987
- Choices, values, and frames.American Psychologist, 1984
- Misinterpretations of Precipitation Probability ForecastsBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1980