Glasgow Aneurysm Score predicts survival after endovascular stenting of abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients from the EUROSTAR registry
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 93 (2) , 191-194
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5262
Abstract
Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score (GAS) in predicting the survival of 5498 patients who underwent endovascular repair (EVAR) of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and were enrolled in the EUROpean collaborators on Stent‐graft Techniques for abdominal aortic Aneurysm Repair (EUROSTAR) Registry between October 1996 and March 2005. Methods: The GAS was calculated in patients who underwent EVAR and was correlated to outcome measurements. Results: The median GAS was 78·8 (interquartile range 71·9–86·4, mean 79·2). Tertile 30‐day mortality rates were 1·1 per cent for patients with a GAS less than 74·4, 2·1 per cent for those with a score between 74·4 and 83·6, and 5·3 per cent for patients with a score over 83·6 (P < 0·001). Multivariate analysis showed that GAS was an independent predictor of postoperative death (P < 0·001). The receiver–operator characteristic curve showed that the GAS had an area under the curve of 0·70 (95 per cent confidence interval 0·66 to 0·74; s.e. 0·02; P < 0·001) for predicting immediate postoperative death. At its best cut‐off value of 86·6, it had a sensitivity of 56·1 per cent, specificity 76·2 per cent and accuracy 75·6 per cent. Multivariable analysis showed that overall survival was significantly different among the tertiles of the GAS (P < 0·001). Conclusion: The GAS was effective in predicting outcome after EVAR. Because its efficacy has also been shown in patients undergoing open repair of AAA, it can be used to aid decisions about treatment in all patients with an AAA. Copyright © 2006 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional and Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic AneurysmsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2004
- Preoperative Risk Stratification in Patients Undergoing Elective Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery: Evaluation of Five Risk Scoring MethodsEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2004
- Glasgow Aneurysm Score in Patients Undergoing Elective Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Finnvasc StudyEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2003
- Value of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score in predicting the immediate and long-term outcome after elective open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysmBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Elective Endovascular versus Open Surgical Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Systematic Review of Short-term ResultsRadiology, 2002
- Aorto-uni-iliac endograft for complex aortoiliac aneurysms compared with tube/bifurcation endografts: results of the EVT/Guidant trials.Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2001
- The Need for Clinical Trials of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Stent-Graft Repair: The EUROSTAR ProjectJournal of Endovascular Surgery, 1997
- Transfemoral Intraluminal Graft Implantation for Abdominal Aortic AneurysmsAnnals of Vascular Surgery, 1991