Clinical trials in orthodontics II: assessment of the quality of reporting of clinical trials published in three orthodontic journals between 1989 and 1998
- 16 December 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Orthodontics
- Vol. 30 (4) , 309-315
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/30.4.309
Abstract
Aims: To test the hypothesis that the quality of reporting of orthodontic clinical trials is insufficient to allow readers to assess the validity of the trial.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials published in OphthalmologyOphthalmology, 2001
- Reporting of Clinical Trials in the JO—the CONSORT GuidelinesJournal of Orthodontics, 2000
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Published by Elsevier ,1998
- Methodologic standards in surgical trialsSurgery, 1996
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1995
- Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solvingBMJ, 1995
- Spinal manipulation and mobilisation for back and neck pain: a blinded review.BMJ, 1991
- Quality assessment of randomized control trials in dental research I. MethodsJournal of Periodontal Research, 1986
- Quality assessment of randomized control trials in dental research II. Results: Periodontal researchJournal of Periodontal Research, 1986