Nursing Diagnosis: An Ethical Analysis
- 1 June 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship
- Vol. 23 (2) , 99-104
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1991.tb00651.x
Abstract
The ethical consequences of nursing diagnosis in light of the principle “to do no harm” have not been adequately explored. It is proposed that human suffering is created through nursing actions that objectively judge and reduce human beings and their complex relationships with the world. The ethical dimensions for nurses required to participate in the diagnostic process are clarified and three levels of potential ham for individuals with parallel ethical conflicts for nurses are described. National nursing associations and accrediting agencies are challenged to consider the paternalistic underpinnings of the diagnostic process and the ethical outcomes of mandating only one approach in practice. Parse's humanistic theory of nursing is presented as one scientific approach which upholds the duty “to do no harm.”Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Integration of nursing theory and nursing ethicsAdvances in Nursing Science, 1989
- A critique of compromiseAdvances in Nursing Science, 1988
- Perspectives on Nursing ScienceNursing Science Quarterly, 1988
- Family Transformation: Parse's Theory in PracticeNursing Science Quarterly, 1988
- HAS NURSING OUTGROWN THE NURSING PROCESS?Nursing2021, 1987
- A programme for nursing ethicsInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 1985
- Nursing Diagnosis in Perspective: Response to a CritiqueImage: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1985
- In Opposition to Nursing Diagnosis: A Minority OpinionImage: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1983
- Introduction to the Theoretical Basis of NursingNursing Research, 1970