The Relationship between Tensile and Flexural Strength of Unidirectional Composites
- 1 August 1992
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Composite Materials
- Vol. 26 (8) , 1173-1180
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839202600805
Abstract
Weibull theory predicts a higher strength in bending than in tension. How ever it assumes that failure initiates from a critical defect, whereas many unidirectional composites fail gradually in bending. A model has been developed of the composite as a bundle, each element of which consists of a small bundle of fibres. The resin is assumed to stabilise the bundle against buckling under compression, whilst allowing the individual elements to split and behave independently in tension. This model also predicts higher strength in bending than in tension, with a ratio of similar order of magnitude to that pre dicted by Weibull theory. The new model provides an explanation for the different strengths in bending and tension which is consistent with the progressive, noncatastrophic failure process which is often observed in bending tests of unidirectional composites.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relationship between strength variability and size effect in unidirectional carbon fibre/epoxyComposites, 1991
- The effect of specimen size on the bending strength of unidirectional carbon fibre-epoxyComposite Structures, 1991
- Effect of End-Tab Design on Tension Specimen Stress ConcentrationsPublished by ASTM International ,1985
- The relationship between tensile strength and flexure strength in fiber-reinforced compositesExperimental Mechanics, 1980
- Strength Ratios of Composite Materials in Flexure and in TensionJournal of Composite Materials, 1974