Validation of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: comparison of energy, protein, and macronutrient intakes estimated with the doubly labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietary recall methods
Open Access
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 70 (4) , 439-447
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/70.4.439
Abstract
Background: The validation of dietary assessment instruments is critical in the evaluation of diet as a chronic disease risk factor. Objective: The objective was to assess the validity of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire by comparison with dietary recall, urinary nitrogen excretion, and total energy expenditure data. Design: Over a 1-y period, data from twelve 24-h dietary recalls, a food-frequency questionnaire, and four 24-h urine samples were obtained from 134 study participants of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study in Potsdam, Germany. In a substudy of 28 participants, total energy expenditure from doubly labeled water measurements was assessed. Results: Energy-adjusted, deattenuated correlation coefficients between the questionnaire and the recalls ranged from 0.54 for dietary fiber to 0.86 for alcohol. Cross-classification of quintiles of nutrient intakes from the questionnaire and recalls indicated severe misclassification to be r = 0.46). Energy intake and total energy expenditure were also significantly correlated (r = 0.48); however, all but one subject underreported their energy intake. The magnitude of underreporting varied considerably, by 22% on average, and increased slightly with increasing energy intake. A similar pattern of underreporting was observed when energy intakes from the 24-h dietary recalls were compared with total energy expenditure. Conclusions: These data indicate an acceptable relative validity of the food-frequency questionnaire in this study population. Compared with measurements of total energy expenditure and protein excretion, however, only moderate agreement with both the food-frequency questionnaire and the 24-h dietary recalls was observed.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is macronutrient composition of dietary intake data affected by underreporting? Results from the EPIC-Potsdam studyEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1998
- The relative validity of vitamin intakes derived from a food frequency questionnaire compared to 24-hour recalls and biological measurements: results from the EPIC pilot study in Germany. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and NutritionInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1997
- Evaluation of energy intake estimated by a diet history in three free-living 70 year old populations in Gothenburg, SwedenEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1997
- Reproducibility and relative validity of energy and macronutrient intake of a food frequency questionnaire developed for the German part of the EPIC project. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and NutritionInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1997
- Reproducibility and relative validity of food group intake in a food frequency questionnaire developed for the German part of the EPIC project. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and NutritionInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1997
- Biochemical validation of a self-administered semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaireBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1995
- Validation of weighed records and other methods of dietary assessment using the 24 h urine nitrogen technique and other biological markersBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1995
- The validation of energy and protein intakes by doubly labelled water and 24‐hour urinary nitrogen excretion in post‐obese subjectsJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 1995
- Measurement of energy expenditure: The doubly-labelled-water method in clinical practiceProceedings of the Nutrition Society, 1991
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986