Protease Inhibitor Resistance Analysis in the MONARK Trial Comparing First-Line Lopinavir-Ritonavir Monotherapy to Lopinavir-Ritonavir plus Zidovudine and Lamivudine Triple Therapy
Open Access
- 1 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 53 (7) , 2934-2939
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01643-08
Abstract
The MONARK study was a pilot randomized trial comparing the safety and efficacy of lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy to those of LPV/r-zidovudine-lamivudine triple therapy for antiretroviral-naïve human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients. Resistance testing was performed at the time of initial screening and at the time of virological failure (defined to include low-level viremia with >50 and <400 HIV-1 virus RNA copies/ml of plasma). Changes from the baseline sequences, including mutations noted on the 2008 International AIDS Society—USA list of resistance-associated protease mutations, were considered. Drug resistance testing was performed for 38 patients (5 of 53 on triple therapy and 33 of 83 on monotherapy). By week 96 (W96), virus samples from 18 of 33 patients in the monotherapy arm showed changes from baseline sequences, and 5 of these patients had viruses with major protease inhibitor (PI) resistance-associated mutations (M46I at W40, L76V at W48, M46I and L76V at W48, L10F and V82A at W72, and L76V at W84). Data on virus phenotypes detected at the time of initial screening and the time of virological failure were available for four patients in whom major PI resistance mutations developed, and these data revealed a mean increase of 2.2-fold (range, 0.75- to 4.6-fold) in the LPV 50% inhibitory concentration. All three patients in whom the L76V PI resistance mutation developed were infected with HIV-1 subtype CRF02_AG. In the triple-therapy group, no major PI resistance mutation was selected among the three patients with protease changes by W48. No association between the baseline CD4 cell count and the viral load, the W4 and final viral loads, or the final LPV trough concentration and the emergence of a major PI resistance mutation was found. Major PI resistance-associated mutations were detected in 5 (6%) of 83 patients treated with LPV/r monotherapy, suggesting that LPV/r monotherapy is an inappropriate first option. The mutation L76V may be considered in further studies of lopinavir resistance.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic factors for virological response in antiretroviral therapy-naive patients in the MONARK Trial randomized to ritonavir-boosted lopinavir aloneAntiviral Therapy, 2009
- A 96‐Week Comparison of Lopinavir‐Ritonavir Combination Therapy Followed by Lopinavir‐Ritonavir Monotherapy versus Efavirenz Combination TherapyThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2008
- Initial therapy with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-containing regimens is more effective than with regimens that spare them with no difference in short-term fat distribution: Hippocampe-ANRS 121 TrialJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2008
- Class-Sparing Regimens for Initial Treatment of HIV-1 InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Long-term (4 years) efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy for maintenance of HIV suppressionJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2008
- Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy or plus zidovudine and lamivudine in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patientsAIDS, 2008
- Impact of HIV viral diversity and baseline resistance on treatment outcomes and the emergence of resistance: the CASTLE study 48-week resultsJournal of the International AIDS Society, 2008
- A Novel Substrate-Based HIV-1 Protease Inhibitor Drug Resistance MechanismPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Repeated HIV-1 resistance genotyping external quality assessments improve virology laboratory performanceJournal of Medical Virology, 2005
- Incidence of Resistance in a Double‐Blind Study Comparing Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus Stavudine and Lamivudine to Nelfinavir plus Stavudine and LamivudineThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004