Prostate Cancer: Detection of Extracapsular Extension by Genitourinary and General Body Radiologists at MR Imaging
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 232 (1) , 140-146
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2321031254
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether predictive value of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings in detection of prostate cancer extracapsular extension (ECE) is significantly affected by the reader’s subspecialty experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cohort study, 344 consecutive patients with biopsy-proved prostate cancer underwent endorectal MR imaging followed by surgery. Likelihood of ECE described in MR imaging reports was compared with clinical predictor variables. ECE was determined from the final pathologic report on specimens resected at surgery. Readers of MR images were classified into genitourinary MR imaging radiologists (n = 4) and general body MR imaging radiologists (n = 6). For data analysis, Wilcoxon rank sum and χ2 tests, as well as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, were used. A difference with P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Univariate analysis results demonstrated that all predictors except clinical stage were significantly associated with detection of ECE in both groups of readers (P < .05). In the genitourinary MR imaging radiologist group of patients, area under the ROC curve for endorectal MR imaging findings (0.833) was larger than areas under the curves for all other predictors (0.566–0.701). In the general body MR imaging radiologist group of patients, area under the ROC curve for endorectal MR imaging findings (0.646) was not larger than areas under the curves for all other predictors (0.582–0.793). Results of multivariate analysis of two models, one with all predictors and another with all predictors except endorectal MR imaging findings, demonstrated a significant increase in area under the ROC curve with endorectal MR images interpreted by genitourinary MR imaging radiologists (P = .019 and .31, respectively). CONCLUSION: Endorectal MR imaging findings are significant predictors for detection of ECE when MR images are interpreted by genitourinary radiologists experienced with MR imaging of the prostate. © RSNA, 2004Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Health Related Quality of Life in Men With Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2003
- Bladder Neck Involvement in Pathological Stage pT4 Radical Prostatectomy Specimens is Not An Independent Prognostic FactorJournal of Urology, 2002
- Variations in Morbidity after Radical ProstatectomyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Validation Study of the Accuracy of a Postoperative Nomogram for Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Shared Patient AnalysisMedical Care, 2001
- Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: General pathologistHuman Pathology, 2001
- ENDORECTAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AS A PREDICTOR OF BIOCHEMICAL OUTCOME AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN MEN WITH CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 2000
- Should we regionalize major surgery? potential benefits and policy considerations1Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2000
- Improved water and lipid suppression for 3D PRESS CSI using rf band selective inversion with gradient dephasing (basing)Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1997
- Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography in Staging Early Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990