Willingness to pay for avoiding coronary restenosis and repeat revascularization: results from a contingent valuation study
- 30 November 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Health Policy
- Vol. 70 (2) , 207-216
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.03.002
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Standard Stents in Patients with Stenosis in a Native Coronary ArteryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Construction of the contingent valuation market in health care:a critical assessmentHealth Economics, 2002
- Quality of life after balloon angioplasty or stenting for acute myocardial infarction: One-year results from the Stent-PAMI trialJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
- Eliciting patients’ values by use of ‘willingness to pay’: letting the theory drive the methodHealth Expectations, 2001
- Comparison of Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery and Stenting for the Treatment of Multivessel DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Improved Clinical Outcome after Widespread Use of Coronary-Artery Stenting in CanadaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- An experimental comparison of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions and real purchase decisionsApplied Economics, 1998
- A note on the relationship between ex ante and expected willingness to pay for health careSocial Science & Medicine, 1996
- Procedural cost of new interventional devicesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1994
- Use and Misuse of the Term “Cost Effective” in MedicineNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986