How to Deal with “The Language-as-Fixed-Effect Fallacy”: Common Misconceptions and Alternative Solutions
- 30 October 1999
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Memory and Language
- Vol. 41 (3) , 416-426
- https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2650
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- On choosing the vehicles of metaphors: Referential concreteness, semantic distances, and individual differencesJournal of Memory and Language, 1989
- When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1984
- On the choice of design and of test statistic in the analysis of experiments with sampled materialsJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1983
- Using Quasi F to prevent alpha inflation due to stimulus variation.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- Comments on Clark's “The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976
- More on the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: Monte Carlo estimates of error rates for F1,F2,F′, and min F′Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976
- A Comparison of Some Approximate F-testsTechnometrics, 1973
- The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological researchJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973
- Generalizing to a Language PopulationPsychological Reports, 1964