Empathy: concept, confusion and consequences in a national curriculum
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Oxford Review of Education
- Vol. 15 (1) , 41-53
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498890150104
Abstract
Promoting empathy is the concern of a number of parts of the Curriculum 5‐16. However, the concept was hazy from its inception, has not been clarified by psychologists’ empirical researches and remains ambiguous as it is used in one school subject, history. Here the concept is shown to impede planning, teaching and assessment. A differentiated view of understanding people in the past is preferred. It is argued that the promise of the National Curriculum will not materialise if its development is based upon logically‐derived assumptions about how children should be reasoning rather than upon psychologically grounded evidence about how they do reason.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aspects of the competence‐performance distinction: Educational, psychological and measurement issuesJournal of Curriculum Studies, 1987
- THE ONE‐QUESTION CONSERVATION EXPERIMENT RECONSIDEREDJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1987
- Explanation, Causes, and Covering LawsHistory and Theory, 1986
- Education and empathyBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 1986
- Structure and Content in Social Cognition: Conceptual and Empirical AnalysesChild Development, 1984
- Sex differences in empathy and related capacities.Psychological Bulletin, 1983
- Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- An Index of Empathy for Children and AdolescentsChild Development, 1982
- Perspective-taking and altruism.Psychological Bulletin, 1982
- Social Role-taking: A Review of the Constructs, Measures, and Measurement PropertiesReview of Educational Research, 1980