Dependence of Auditory Brainstem Response on Click Polarity and High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Audiology
- Vol. 31 (2) , 72-86
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099209072903
Abstract
An investigation is presented on the effect of click polarity upon the auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cases of simulated high-frequency hearing loss. A high-frequency hearing loss was stimulated in 12 normal subjects by applying a high-pass noise masker, the noise cutoff frequency being varied in half-octave steps through the range of audiometric frequencies. With this paradigm, the effects of click polarity on the ABR are similar to those reported in patients with high-frequency hearing loss, including changes in waveform morphology and substantial peak latency shifts. To evaluate the role of individual cochlear frequency channels in a more direct way, half-octave narrow-band responses were determined by pair-wise subtraction of the high-pass-noise-masked responses. As far as ABR peak latencies are concerned, stimulus polarity effects tend to increase towards the lower frequency bands. Thus, the selective elimination of the contribution to the ABR of cochlear high-frequency channels can be held responsible for the increased dependence of ABR on click polarity observed in high-frequency hearing loss. However, statistical evaluation of peak I, III and V latencies, both in high-pass-noise-masked and in narrow-band ABRs, reveals that the latency effects are not systematic between subjects. Mechanisms producing the observed rarefaction-condensation differences, possible explanations for the large intersubject variability and the consequences for clinical interpretation of ABR are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). II: Effects of broadband noise level and high-pass masker cutoff frequency across click polarityThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1989
- Phase-Intensity Effects on the ABRScandinavian Audiology, 1988
- Interaction of Click Polarity, Stimulus Level, and Repetition Rate on the Auditory Brainstem ResponseScandinavian Audiology, 1988
- Comparison between Auditory Brain Stem Responses Evoked by Rarefaction and Condensation Step Functions and ClicksInternational Journal of Audiology, 1986
- Uncertainties of topodiagnosis of auditory nerve and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials due to rarefaction and condensation stimuliElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1985
- The Effects of Stimulus Rise-Time and Polarity on the Auditory Brainstem ResponsesScandinavian Audiology, 1984
- Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) to Rarefaction and Condensation Clicks in Normal and Abnormal EarsScandinavian Audiology, 1982
- Brainstem Auditory-Evoked ResponsesArchives of Neurology, 1979
- Human Auditory Nerve Action Potentials and Brain Stem Evoked Responses: Effects of Audiogram Shape and Lesion LocationJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1977
- The effect of sound pressure waveform on human brain stem auditory evoked responsesBrain Research, 1975