Network ‘Small-World-Ness’: A Quantitative Method for Determining Canonical Network Equivalence
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 30 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 3 (4) , e0002051
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002051
Abstract
Many technological, biological, social, and information networks fall into the broad class of ‘small-world’ networks: they have tightly interconnected clusters of nodes, and a shortest mean path length that is similar to a matched random graph (same number of nodes and edges). This semi-quantitative definition leads to a categorical distinction (‘small/not-small’) rather than a quantitative, continuous grading of networks, and can lead to uncertainty about a network's small-world status. Moreover, systems described by small-world networks are often studied using an equivalent canonical network model – the Watts-Strogatz (WS) model. However, the process of establishing an equivalent WS model is imprecise and there is a pressing need to discover ways in which this equivalence may be quantified. We defined a precise measure of ‘small-world-ness’ S based on the trade off between high local clustering and short path length. A network is now deemed a ‘small-world’ if S>1 - an assertion which may be tested statistically. We then examined the behavior of S on a large data-set of real-world systems. We found that all these systems were linked by a linear relationship between their S values and the network size n. Moreover, we show a method for assigning a unique Watts-Strogatz (WS) model to any real-world network, and show analytically that the WS models associated with our sample of networks also show linearity between S and n. Linearity between S and n is not, however, inevitable, and neither is S maximal for an arbitrary network of given size. Linearity may, however, be explained by a common limiting growth process. We have shown how the notion of a small-world network may be quantified. Several key properties of the metric are described and the use of WS canonical models is placed on a more secure footing.Keywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networksProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Nonoptimal Component Placement, but Short Processing Paths, due to Long-Distance Projections in Neural SystemsPLoS Computational Biology, 2006
- Complex networks: Structure and dynamicsPhysics Reports, 2006
- The brainstem reticular formation is a small-world, not scale-free, networkProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2005
- Dynamic Properties of Network Motifs Contribute to Biological Network OrganizationPLoS Biology, 2005
- Networks and epidemic modelsJournal of The Royal Society Interface, 2005
- Modelling development of epidemics with dynamic small-world networksJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2005
- Dynamical Motifs: Building Blocks of Complex Dynamics in Sparsely Connected Random NetworksPhysical Review Letters, 2004
- The structure of the nervous system of the nematodeCaenorhabditis elegansPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1986
- EDF Statistics for Goodness of Fit and Some ComparisonsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1974