Development and Aftercare of Clinical Guidelines
- 26 September 2001
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 286 (12) , 1509-1511
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.12.1509
Abstract
As health care technologies, evidence-based practice, and clinical guidelines continue to evolve, so does understanding of their limitations. The emphasis ofKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Practice Guidelines: How Quickly Do Guidelines Become Outdated?Survey of Anesthesiology, 2002
- Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisalThe Lancet, 2000
- Essence of Evidence-Based Medicine: A Case ReportJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical DecisionsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer: individual patient data vs literature dataBritish Journal of Cancer, 1995
- The practice guidelines development cycle: a conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1995
- Do Consensus Conferences Work? A Process Evaluation of the NIH Consensus Development ProgramJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1988
- Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1986