Merging the Simple View of Reading with Rauding Theory
Open Access
- 1 December 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Reading Behavior
- Vol. 25 (4) , 439-455
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969309547829
Abstract
The Simple View of reading was merged with rauding theory by advancing a revision, called Simple View II. The original Simple View, described by Hoover and Gough (1990), has several inconsistencies between theoretical concepts and how concepts are measured. These inconsistencies were illuminated and clarified by using constructs from rauding theory. The resulting Simple View II focuses on how individual differences in reading level (called rauding accuracy level, AL) are almost entirely a function of word recognition level (called pronunciation level, PL) and listening comprehension level (called auditory accuracy level, AudAL). An analysis of data collected from 61 students in Grades 3–5, indicated that all of the reliable variance in AL was probably accounted for by PL and AudAL, thus providing strong support for Simple View II. Furthermore, the reading level of students in GE units (e.g., Grade 5) could be predicted highly accurately by simply averaging (a) their level of word recognition in GE units (e.g., Grade 3) and (b) their level of language comprehension in GE units (e.g., Grade 7). When Simple View II is merged with rauding theory, the result is a theoretical framework which includes interrelationships among all of the important constructs involved in reading ability, for students in Grade 1 through college.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Three Factors in Reading Ability: Reanalysis of a Study by Cunningham, Stanovich, and WilsonJournal of Reading Behavior, 1992
- Commentary: Effect of Prediction Activities, Prior Knowledge, and Text Type upon Amount Comprehended: Using Rauding Theory to Critique Schema Theory ResearchReading Research Quarterly, 1992
- What Do Standardized Tests of Reading Comprehension Measure in Terms of Efficiency, Accuracy, and Rate?Reading Research Quarterly, 1992
- Using Letter-Naming Speed to Diagnose Reading DisabilityRemedial and Special Education, 1991
- Intelligence and reading ability in grades 2–12Intelligence, 1990
- The simple view of readingReading and Writing, 1990
- Predicting accuracy of comprehension from the relative difficulty of the materialLearning and Individual Differences, 1990
- Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1988
- Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1986
- Decoding, Reading, and Reading DisabilityRemedial and Special Education, 1986