GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency
Top Cited Papers
- 1 December 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 64 (12) , 1294-1302
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Higher vs Lower Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Patients With Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeJAMA, 2010
- Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may misleadBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008
- Vasopressin or Epinephrine for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2006
- Meta-analysis of flavonoids for the treatment of haemorrhoidsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2006
- Risk of cardiovascular events and rofecoxib: cumulative meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2004
- A Comparison of Vasopressin and Epinephrine for Out-of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomesStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994