Ordinal Cheap Talk in Common Value Auctions
Preprint
- 1 December 2002
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Sellers benefit on average from revealing information about their goods to buyers, but the incentive to exaggerate undermines the credibility of seller statements. When multiple goods are being auctioned, we show that ordinal cheap talk, which reveals a complete or partial ordering of the different goods by value, can be credible. Ordinal statements are not susceptible to exaggeration because they simultaneously reveal favorable information about some goods and unfavorable information about other goods. Any informative ordering increases revenues in accordance with the linkage principle, and the complete ordering is asymptotically revenue-equivalent to full revelation as the number of goods becomes large. These results provide a new explanation in addition to bundling, versioning, and complementarities for how a seller benefits from the sale of multiple goods.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay' s reputation systemPublished by Emerald Publishing ,2004
- Asymptotic Revenue Equivalence in AuctionsJournal of Economic Theory, 2002
- Efficiency and Information Aggregation in AuctionsAmerican Economic Review, 2000
- Competing Against BundlesSSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
- Cheap talk can matter in bargainingJournal of Economic Theory, 1989
- Multiproduct Monopoly, Commodity Bundling, and Correlation of ValuesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1989
- Strategic Information TransmissionEconometrica, 1982
- A Theory of Auctions and Competitive BiddingEconometrica, 1982
- A Combinatorial Auction Mechanism for Airport Time Slot AllocationThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1982
- Distribution-Free InequalitiesPublished by Elsevier ,1980