External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 6 March 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 13 (1) , 33
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-33
Abstract
A prognostic model should not enter clinical practice unless it has been demonstrated that it performs a useful role. External validation denotes evaluation of model performance in a sample independent of that used to develop the model. Unlike for logistic regression models, external validation of Cox models is sparsely treated in the literature. Successful validation of a model means achieving satisfactory discrimination and calibration (prediction accuracy) in the validation sample. Validating Cox models is not straightforward because event probabilities are estimated relative to an unspecified baseline function.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- External Validity of Risk Models: Use of Benchmark Values to Disentangle a Case-Mix Effect From Incorrect CoefficientsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Reporting performance of prognostic models in cancer: a reviewBMC Medicine, 2010
- Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a reviewBMC Medicine, 2010
- Time-Dependent Predictive Values of Prognostic Biomarkers With Failure Time OutcomeJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2008
- Gene expression profiling: Does it add predictive accuracy to clinical characteristics in cancer prognosis?European Journal Of Cancer, 2007
- A new measure of prognostic separation in survival dataStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- Flexible parametric proportional‐hazards and proportional‐odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effectsStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Flexible regression models with cubic splinesStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Note on GroupingJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1957