Oviposition stimulants inBarbarea vulgaris forPieris rapae andP. napi oleracea: isolation, identification and differential activity
- 1 February 1994
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Chemical Ecology
- Vol. 20 (2) , 423-438
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02064448
Abstract
The closely related butterflies,Pieris rapae andP. napi oleracea, readily laid eggs onBarbarea vulgaris in greenhouse cages. When offered a choice between cabbage andB. vulgaris, P. rapae showed no preference, butP. napi oleracea preferredB. vulgaris. Bioassays of extracts ofB. vulgaris foliage revealed the presence of oviposition deterrent(s) in l-butanol extracts as well as stimulants in the postbutanol water extracts. However, the deterrent effect was apparently outweighed by the strong stimulatory effect in the whole plants. The postbutanol water extract was preferred over an equivalent cabbage extract by both species, but more significantly in the case ofP. napi oleracea. The stimulants were isolated by open column chromatography and HPLC, and the activity was associated with three glucosinolates.P. napi oleracea was more sensitive thanP. rapae to the natural concentration of compounds1 and3, whereas both species were strongly stimulated to oviposit by natural concentrations of compound2. Compounds1 and2 were identified as (2R)-glucobarbarin and (2S)-glucobarbarin, respectively, and3 was identified as glucobrassicin, on the basis of their UV, mass, and NMR spectra. When the pure compounds were tested at the same concentrations applied to bean plants, the (2R)-glucobarbarin at 0.2 mg/plant was preferred over a standard cabbage extract by both butterfly species. However, at a dose of 0.02 mg/plant,P. rapae preferred the cabbage extract whereasP. napi oleracea still preferred the (2R)-glucobarbarin. No such difference in response of the two species to the same two concentrations of (2S)-glucobarbarin was obtained. The results indicate a distinct difference in sensitivity of these butterflies to the epimers of glucobarbarin, and the differences in behavioral responses of the two butterfly species depend to a large extent on the concentration of stimulant present.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relative activities of glucosinolates as oviposition stimulants forPieris rapae andP. napi oleraceaJournal of Chemical Ecology, 1994
- Differential selection of host plants by two Pieris species: the role of oviposition stimulants and deterrentsEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1993
- A chemical basis for differential acceptance ofErysimum cheiranthoides by twoPieris speciesJournal of Chemical Ecology, 1993
- Leaf surface chemicals stimulating oviposition byPieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) on cabbageChemoecology, 1992
- Potent natural egg-laying stimulant for cabbage butterflyPieris rapaeJournal of Chemical Ecology, 1991
- Glucosinolate composition of seeds from 297 species of wild plantsPhytochemistry, 1991
- MECHANISM OF HOST‐PLANT RECOGNITIONEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1982
- isoThiocyanates. XXXIII. An isoThiocyanate Glucoside (Glucobarbarin) of Reseda luteola L.Acta Chemica Scandinavica, 1958
- isoThiocyanates. XXVIII. A New isoThiocyanate Glucoside (Glucobarbarin) Furnishing (-)-5-Phenyl-2-oxazolidinethione upon Enzymic Hydrolysis.Acta Chemica Scandinavica, 1957
- The Biology of the Small White Butterfly (Pieris rapae), with Special Reference to the Factors Controlling its AbundanceJournal of Animal Ecology, 1940