Nickel dermatitis from cheap earrings
- 1 October 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Contact Dermatitis
- Vol. 21 (4) , 245-248
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1989.tb03203.x
Abstract
In 1988, 64% of our patients patch test positive to al least I allergen of the ICDRG standard series-were nickel sensitive. In 70% of 300 patients evaluated, dermatitis started on the earlobes and was related to the regular wearing of cheap earrings. At the same time, 62% of 735 young schoolgirls were found to have dermatitis of their carlobes and all regularly wore cheap earrings. 9 clasps and clips commonly used in earrings released high quantities of nickel ions (between 49 and 103 μg/12 h), having been stored in synthetic sweat. A round piece cut from a clasp was taped U the skin of nickel-sensitive patients, previously tested with 20 μl of NiSO4 5%, 2.5%, 1% aq. solutions, giving a response similar to that caused by the 5% solution. High daily absorption of Ni ions through the skin follows its repetitive exposure la cheap earring, causing, firstly, a direct inflammatory reaction, then followed, in our opinion, by sensitization.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nickel sensitivity: effects of prolonged oral intake of the elementContact Dermatitis, 1988
- Allergic contact dermatitis to nickel: Bioavailability from consumer products and provocation thresholdJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1988
- Patch test reactivity to nickel alloysContact Dermatitis, 1987
- Sequential immunophenotypic study of lymphoid infiltrate in allergic and irritant reactionsContact Dermatitis, 1987
- Nickel penetration in allergic individuals: bioavailability versus X‐ray micro‐analysis detectionContact Dermatitis, 1985
- Recovery of nickel sulphate from a standard patch testContact Dermatitis, 1984
- Nickel release from ear piercing kits and earringsContact Dermatitis, 1984
- Release of nickel from silver coinsActa Dermato-Venereologica, 1974
- EFFECTS OF NICKEL ON THE SKIN.British Journal of Dermatology, 1956