Assessing accuracy in linkage analysis by means of confidence regions
- 11 June 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Genetic Epidemiology
- Vol. 25 (1) , 59-72
- https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.10248
Abstract
When statistical linkage to a certain chromosomal region has been found, it is of interest to develop methods quantifying the accuracy with which the disease locus can be mapped. In this paper, we investigate the performance of three different types of confidence regions, with asymptotically correct coverage probability as the number of pedigrees grows. Our setup is that of a saturated map of marker data. We allow for arbitrary combinations of pedigree structures, and treat various kinds of genetic models (e.g. binary and quantitative phenotypes) in a unified way. The linkage scores are weighted sums of the individual family scores, with NPL and lod scores as special cases. We show that the expected length of the confidence region is inversely proportional to the slope-to-noise ratio, or equivalently, inversely proportional to the product of the square of the noncentrality parameter and a certain normalized slope-to-noise ratio. Our investigations reveal that maximal expected linkage scores can be quite different from estimation-based performance criteria based on expected length of confidence regions. The main reason is that there is no simple relationship between peak height and peak slope of the mean linkage score. One application of our results is planning of linkage studies: given a certain genetic model, we can approximate the number of pedigrees needed to obtain a confidence region with given coverage probability and expected length.Keywords
Funding Information
- Swedish Research Council (629-2002-6286)
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing accuracy in linkage analysis by means of confidence regionsGenetic Epidemiology, 2003
- Upward Bias in Estimation of Genetic EffectsAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2002
- Bias in Estimates of Quantitative-Trait–Locus Effect in Genome Scans: Demonstration of the Phenomenon and a Method-of-Moments Procedure for Reducing BiasAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2002
- Large Upward Bias in Estimation of Locus-Specific Effects from Genomewide ScansAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2001
- A Survey of Affected-Sibship Statistics for Nonparametric Linkage AnalysisAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2001
- Linkage Thresholds for Two-stage Genome ScansAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 1998
- Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage resultsNature Genetics, 1995
- On the relative importance of marker heterozygosity and intermarker distance in gene mappingGenomics, 1992
- Boundary Crossing Probabilities and Statistical ApplicationsThe Annals of Statistics, 1986